South African companies would be barred from moving crypto assets across the border in either direction under a draft framework Treasury and the Reserve Bank released for public comment on Monday.

The proposal sits in an 88-page draft Crypto Asset Manual issued by the Reserve Bank's Financial Surveillance Department under Exchange Control Circular 19/2026.

Resident individuals still get a route offshore, under either the R2m single discretionary allowance or the R10m foreign capital allowance. Resident entities are offered no equivalent. Comments close on 30 September.

Companies could still buy crypto for rand locally, hold it in a custodial wallet, shift it between local providers and sell it back. All of that counts as domestic. What closes is stablecoin settlement for importers and exporters, crypto payment rails for merchants receiving from abroad, offshore token fundraising by local startups and any offshore treasury use.

A Cape Town software firm invoicing a US client in a dollar stablecoin would have no lawful way to receive it through a licensed local provider, while its founder personally could.

Other provisions in the draft include minimum unimpaired capital of R5m or 15% of three-year average gross income, a bar on offshoring business processes, and an outright prohibition on transacting with residents of Lesotho, Namibia and eSwatini.

TechCentral notes the joint statement says only individuals will be allowed to externalise crypto at this stage, wording that suggests sequencing rather than a settled position. ITWeb reports the regulators' stated aim is limiting regulatory arbitrage and helping FinSurv disrupt illicit flows, while CNBC Africa points out SA already hosts hundreds of licensed providers and that major banks are well into building institutional crypto products.

The underlying logic is coherent enough. South Africa has exchange control, crypto routes around it, and a regulator freshly out of grey listing has good reason to want visibility on what crosses the border. But the split between individuals and entities is hard to defend on the regulators' own terms.

If the worry is capital flight, individuals moving up to R10m each is the bigger opening, not a software firm receiving a USDC invoice from a client in Austin. As drafted, the rule pushes precisely the flows FinSurv most wants to observe toward personal allowances, which the same document separately makes illegal.

Worth submitting a comment if stablecoin revenue touches your business, because the last round shows the text does move: the industry argument that local custodial transfers are not capital exports made it into this draft.

You might also like our piece on digital stokvel tech, how Fintura's pre-seed is rebuilding financial software, and our case for small business reform in South Africa.

Get more SA tech and business news and subscribe to The Open Letter.