Elon Musk says SpaceX deliberately restricted its Starlink satellite network in Ukraine after more than a week of limits that disrupted Ukraine's military. "Ukraine military violated Starlink terms of service and used it for offensive drone strikes to kill people. That loophole was closed last week," he posted on X on Saturday.

From 14 October, Starlink and its military version, Starshield, stopped working properly on equipment moving faster than about 160km/h, which cut off fast drones. Ukraine's defence ministry said on Saturday that connections were stable again on equipment moving at more than 400km/h.

The restrictions were not about internet speed. They limited how fast a device could be moving and still keep its satellite link, so a soldier's terminal kept working while a drone flying faster than the cap lost its connection. Ukrainian officials said that hampered their ability to intercept Russian attack drones and forced some operations to be cancelled.

Starlink is used across the front for communications, logistics and defensive drones that shoot down incoming ones, and drones using Starshield have helped Ukraine gain ground in several areas this year. Ukraine says it does not use the systems for long-range strikes on Russian oil refineries.

Who ordered the restrictions is disputed. For days, Musk and US officials each said publicly that the decision could only have come from the other side. Reuters has reported that the order to restrict Starshield, which is operated by the US government, came from inside the White House.

The restrictions began shortly after US President Donald Trump announced a deal to buy Russian diesel while pressing Kyiv to stop striking Russian refineries, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy saw them as retaliation for refusing. Trump said on Friday that if the problems continued, he would "get it straightened out".

Reuters reported the restoration, Musk's comments and the dispute over who gave the order. Axios described the episode as a blame game between the White House and Musk that drew criticism from both US political parties. CNBC reported Ukraine's defence ministry confirming the restored connections.

Set aside the war itself, and the lesson is about dependence. A country's frontline communications ran on a network owned by one private company and partly operated by a foreign government, and for a week they were limited by a decision Ukraine did not make and still cannot fully explain. That is the sovereignty question in its plainest form.

It applies well beyond satellites. South Africa is still arguing over whether Starlink can be licensed here, and the ICASA ownership fight is at heart a control debate. The same logic covers the cloud regions, AI models and payment networks local businesses rely on, which can be priced, limited or switched off by someone else. We saw the physical version when data centres became targets in two wars this year.

For governments, that argues for local alternatives and clear agreements on who controls what. For businesses, the practical step is smaller: know which critical services run on someone else's infrastructure, and have a backup you could switch to if they changed the terms tomorrow.

You might also like our piece on Starship reaching orbit, Musk's SpaceX share pledge, and the Réunion subsea cable.

Get more SA tech and business news and subscribe to The Open Letter.