Tesla has put the Cybercab on public roads in Austin, Texas, with riders now able to book a driverless trip in one through the Robotaxi app inside a geofenced area. The two-seat vehicle has no steering wheel, no pedals and no mirrors, and runs on FSD v15, a software branch developed specifically for the robotaxi fleet.
It has been in production since April, and at least 51 units were registered in Texas before the launch.
Interesting insights on Tesla Cybercab
The design decisions are the business model. Two seats match what most ride-hailing trips actually carry. Removing the steering wheel, pedals and mirrors strips cost out of every unit. Inductive charging and a self-cleaning routine remove the human touchpoints between fares. And the perception stack is cameras only, no lidar and no radar, which is the single biggest cost difference against rivals.
Tesla has targeted a price under $30,000 a vehicle and claimed operating costs of 30 to 40 US cents a mile, and it has filed plans to build more than 125,000 Cybercabs a year. Scale is already being allocated: Clark County in Nevada cleared up to 8,000 driverless vehicles over the next 12 months, with Tesla drawing roughly 5,000 of that ceiling, though its Cybercab chief engineer told regulators the company expects to field about 2,500.
Waymo, which runs around 4,000 robotaxis across 14 US cities and logs 500,000 paid trips a week, was cleared for up to 1,000 and argued days before the launch that camera-only autonomy is not enough.
What others are saying about Tesla Cybercab
CNBC reported Tesla shares fell 6% on Friday, with RBC Capital Markets noting the event offered limited new disclosure and left pricing, production cadence and regulatory approvals open. Yahoo Finance set out the Las Vegas permit allocations across Tesla, Waymo, Uber and Zoox. TechCrunch reported that NHTSA opened an audit query into how Tesla self-certified a vehicle without the manual controls federal standards assume. Bookings have continued and the probe does not currently stop commercial service.
The vehicle is the cost argument
Everything unusual about the Cybercab points at one number: cost per mile. Waymo's approach works but rides on an expensive sensor stack and a modified production car.
Tesla is betting that a purpose-built two-seater with cameras only, no controls to certify and no cleaning crew can undercut that badly enough to make the network profitable at scale. If sub-$30,000 a unit and 30 to 40 cents a mile hold, that is a different business, not a cheaper version of the same one.
Whether the software gets there is the open question, and Waymo's 500,000 paid trips a week is the benchmark. For South Africa, none of this arrives soon. We are still working out registration for human drivers, as inDrive's own NPTR process showed.
But these economics set global platform strategy, and Uber has already committed more than $10-billion to autonomous partnerships while closing markets it cannot make work.
You might also like our piece on why UberX was discontinued in South Africa, the Uber GDPR fine over automated driver deactivations, and how SA online retail reached a tenth of all retail turnover.
Get more SA tech and business news and subscribe to The Open Letter.


