South Africa and Brazil used the eighth session of their Joint Commission in Pretoria this week to push for deeper economic and industrial co-operation, naming trade, critical minerals, manufacturing and technology as priorities. Bilateral trade runs at about $2-billion a year, roughly R32-billion.
According to unnamed Dirco sources, the two disputes that actually matter to South African producers, frozen poultry dumping and subsidised sugar, were not on the table.
Interesting insights on SA-Brazil trade
The pressure driving this is American. South Africa faced a 30% tariff on many exports from August 2025, the highest rate on the continent, before a partial reversal this year. Brazil was hit with 25% from July 2026, tied to Trump's objections to the domestic prosecution of former president Jair Bolsonaro, which Brazilian foreign minister Mauro Vieira called political in nature.
Both governments are hedging. But note the scale. That R32-billion makes Brazil South Africa's largest Latin American trading partner and its second-largest in the Americas, which says more about how thin those ties are than how strong this one is, and the balance already runs heavily in Brazil's favour.
Ronald Lamola's substantive point was on critical minerals, where demand may rise fourfold by 2040, arguing against reproducing a pattern in which the Global South ships raw material and the value is added elsewhere. Vieira offered vaccine production, health manufacturing, space science and ocean research.
What others are saying about SA-Brazil trade
Business Day reported the talks and the deliberate exclusion of the live trade disputes. In a separate column, David Wolpert argues the poultry master plan's own success may mean less protection is now warranted, which is the counter-case to the dumping complaint. Business Day also reported India easing phytosanitary barriers on South African citrus in August after nearly a decade of negotiation, opening a market of roughly 1.5 billion people.
Diversification is right; this vehicle is small
The strategic logic is sound. Depending on one export market that can impose 30% overnight is a bad position, and we have seen how fast a single rule change can rewrite a business in what closing one loophole did to Shein's valuation.
But hold the announcement to its size. R32-billion of two-way trade is a rounding error against what the US tariff threatened; the balance favours Brazil, and the two fights South African farmers care about were removed before talks began.
Meanwhile, the trade department is weighing tariffs of up to 50% on Chinese and Indian vehicles, so we are courting Brics partners and considering tariffs against Brics partners in the same quarter.
The concrete wins sit elsewhere: India's citrus decision, and the M&A wave showing where capital is actually moving. Beneficiation is the right argument. Nobody has signed anything.
You might also like our piece on why South Africa's business regulation is more restrictive than China's, what the Big Mac Index rand figure says about export competitiveness, and what the 2026 draft tax bills add on the cost side.
Get more SA tech and business news and subscribe to The Open Letter.


